有一种鸟

有一种鸟是永远也关不住的,不仅仅因为它的每片羽翼上都沾满了自由的光辉,更因为他在被关的时候得到了很多鸟儿的营救 ...

25/05/2011

刘晓原律师@liu_xiaoyuan 5月24日被“消失”的16条敏感推文

5月24日下午,刘晓原律师 @liu_xiaoyuan 突然发推求客户端,说要删除一些“敏感”推文。

为让网友明白何为“敏感”推文,以免重蹈覆辙,有心网友特将其删除前后推文做了对比,发现被迫删除的“敏感”推文有如下16条,均与艾未未案相关:


1. 从言论上找不到问题整人,就从经济上找罪治人。这是"修理"异议人士的贯用手法。http://twitter.com/#!/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/71795083678199811 2011-5-21

2. 下午,我去了宋庄艺术区。晚上,见到了栗宪庭老师。在艾未未被带走后,他是北京艺术圈最早站出来为艾说话艺术家,他写艾的文章已在海外很多媒体发表。2011-5-22 http://twitter.com/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/71954858579730432

3. 4月3日艾未未被带走后,我在新浪微博发了不少消息。4月5日,新浪管理员发来通知,说我在微博发敏感内容遭到他人举报,需审核发言一周。没想到审到现在还没有解除。无奈之际,今天我再注册一个“刘晓原律师2011”微博。万万没想到的是,刚发第一条微博就显示要审核。2011-5-22 http://twitter.com/#!/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72232723674169344

4. 今天下午,我注册了“刘晓原律师2011”微博http://weibo.com/sorry?isblackip,因为发了我与艾未未多张合影照片被禁止访问。“刘晓原律师2010”微博http://weibo.com/liuxiaoyuan2010,发言要先经过审核,还没有“被阵亡”。 2011-5-22 http://twitter.com/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72267312572530688

5. 艾未未在机场被带走后,警方随即到工作室进行搜查,还把工作人员带去调查。我以为,他们当时并不是奔经济问题而来。为何这样判断,我是基于他们当时扣押物品只是办公电脑和拍制作的社会事件光盘,而没有搜走公司财务账本。在引起国际关注后,就将目标转向为经济问题。于是就搞了第二次搜查把账本全扣押。2011-5-23 http://twitter.com/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72444169725018113

6. 在艾未未被带走前,税务机关没有找“发课”公司调查过纳税问题,即税务机关没发现“发课”公司纳税上有问题。公安机关怎么就给发现了呢?2011-5-23 http://twitter.com/#!/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72450375143264256

7. 一个企业是否有逃税问题,应先由税务机关作调查下结论。如发现有逃税行为,由税务机关作处罚决定。在逃税企业不补缴税款、不接受处罚时,当逃税金额达到刑事立案标准,税务机关就会将逃税案移交给公安机关立案侦查,由司法机关依法追究刑事责任。2011-5-23 http://twitter.com/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72452055394033665

8. 艾未未的案件是在税务机关还没有介入作出调查得出结论前,公安机关就先把人带走了,所以说,一开始并不是奔经济问题而来。设想一下,如艾不去关注社会事件,不“特立独行”,还会查什么“经济问题”吗? 2011-5-23 http://twitter.com/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72453675666259968

9. 艾未未被带走整整五十天了。前两天,新华社发消息说,他是在外被“监视居住”。鉴于艾未未在北京有固定住处,按照《公安机关办理刑事案件程序》规定,就应把他送回家中进行“监视居住”。 2011-5-23 http://twitter.com/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72457516151353344

10. 有人对我讲,搞艺术经营的人经济上都会有问题。我不了解艺术圈的事情,这个说法是否准确,我不敢妄加评论。但我想,如果这是一个普遍存在问题,为何很少看到有艺术家因经济问题被查处呢?看来查处艺术家,更多的还是与“特立独行”有关。2011-5-23 http://twitter.com/#!/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72460330512564224

11. 当自己不敢说话时,切不可指责敢站出来说话的人 RT@LiuGang8964: ------现在刘艳萍出奇地积极,但她的行为对艾未未没有实质性的帮助。她仅仅是为了抢夺艾未未旗帜,防止这面旗帜被路青、刘晓原等人扛起来。家人和律师是艾未未旗帜的最直接继承者。2011-5-23 http://twitter.com/#!/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72461326332600320

12. 出事前,艾未未身边、特别是在网络上有众多追随者。如今他出事了,很多人连话都不敢说,做了“潜水员”。怕说话也就罢了,让人可气的是,有的竟然还指责敢站出来说话的人。2011-5-23 http://twitter.com/#!/liu_xiaoyuan/statuses/72464377466470400

13. 我还没有被家属聘请,更不可能看到案卷材料,对艾未未事件的分析,谈的更多是程序方面问题。但我谈程序上问题,也是依据现行法律、法规、规章。尽管有人对谈程序不高兴,但我以为,没有程序正义,又何来实体公正?2011-5-23 http://goo.gl/anShB

14. 由艾未未涉嫌“逃税”案,让我想起了刘晓庆“偷税”案(刑法修正案七后,偷税改称逃税)。刘晓庆办的公司,先被北京市地方税务局调查“涉税”问题,在查明公司有巨额偷税行为后,才移交给公安机关作为刑事案立案侦查。公安机关对公司几名负责人作出刑拘决定。而艾的案件走的程序正好相反。2011-5-23 http://goo.gl/ezQzD

15. 78岁老太太学会了“翻墙”:今天上午,我去了艾未未母亲高瑛家,老太太告诉我,前段时间买了一台电脑,现在已学会了上网,也知道如何“翻墙”。没事就经常“翻”到墙外去看报道。2011-5-23 http://goo.gl/3KzZQ

16. 5月21日写过一篇《有一种强制措施,叫“监视居住”》博文。文章谈了法律中监视居住的规定,但没有谈及“监视居住”中的问题。现再写一篇博文,谈谈这些问题。但文章中所谈问题,是引用别人调研结论,不是我在执业中发现,千万不能“对号入座”。 2011-5-24 http://is.gd/L4foSJ http://goo.gl/FeqlM

来源:http://twiffo.com/jhO

附相关推文:

1、duyanpili @ liu_xiaoyuan 为何要删?删什么敏感推文啊?http://goo.gl/V6JTB

2、wenyunchao @ duyanpili @ liu_xiaoyuan 想必是有司要刘律师删那些关于艾未未案的评论呗。http://goo.gl/V6JTB

3、liu_xiaoyuan 删了很多条吧,我没有数 RT @duyanpili: 你删了几条啊~~,嘻嘻,我可是订阅你的推,都有备份泥~~RT@liu_xiaoyuan: 用日文版推特登陆,我不知如何删帖。用“乌鸦嘴”登陆,删除不了帖文。但用推波登陆,删帖文比较方便。http://goo.gl/cDBjs

4、li2nd @liu_xiaoyuan @duyanpili 霹雳姐,辛苦一下做个比对,然后把刘律所删的推出来,大家
伙儿学习一下神马东西敏感! http://goo.gl/zX7V0


附:之前有些网友已经将刘晓原上述推文中重要部分翻译成英文:

After Ai Weiwei was taken away from the airport, the police went to his workshop to conduct a search and took away other employees for investigation. At the time I believed that they weren't pursuing economic charges. Why did I think that? Because they only seized the office computer and the video discs of some social actions, not the company accounts. Only after the case had attracted international attention did they shift their focus to economic problems. So, they then carried out a second search to seize the account books.

Before Ai Weiwei was taken into custody, the tax authorities never investigated any tax issue at the "Fake" Company. In other words, if the tax authority never uncovered any issue regarding tax payment at the "Fake" Company, how did the public security organ come to their discovery, then?

Determination of whether or not a company has been evading tax should result from of an investigation by the tax authorities. If they discover tax evasion, the tax authorities issue an [administrative] penalty. If the company doesn't pay the missing tax or disregards the penalty, and if the amount in question meets the standard for launching a criminal investigation, the tax authority will hand the tax-evasion case over to the police for investigation and the law-enforcement authorities will pursue criminal responsibility in accordance with the law.

In Ai Weiwei's case, the police detained him before the tax authorities had issued a ruling about any investigation. So, at the beginning they were not pursuing any economic issues. Think about it: if Ai Weiwei hadn't been paying attention to social problems and didn't conduct himself in an "unconventional" manner, would anyone really be looking into any "economic issues"?

People have said to me that those in art business all have economic problems. I'm not too familiar with the art circles, so I don't dare comment on this. But I think that if this is such a common problem, why don't we see more artists being investigated for economic problems? It seems that more often than not, artists get investigated for their "unconventional" behavior.

来源:http://goo.gl/E0J3q



No comments:

Post a comment